Kirk Bansak
Kirk Bansak
Verified email at ucsd.edu
TitleCited byYear
How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Science 354 (6309), 217-222, 2016
2462016
Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment
K Bansak, J Ferwerda, J Hainmueller, A Dillon, D Hangartner, ...
Science 359 (6373), 325-329, 2018
722018
The number of choice tasks and survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Political Analysis 26 (1), 112-119, 2018
352018
Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Nature Human Behaviour 1 (7), 1-6, 2017
232017
Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Political Science Research and Methods, 1-19, 2017
222017
Enhancing compliance with an evolving treaty: a task for an improved BWC intersessional process
KC Bansak
Arms Control Today 41 (5), 13, 2011
72011
The ideological basis of the Grexit debate
K Bansak, M Bechtel, J Hainmueller, Y Margalit
62016
Biodefense and transparency: The dual-use dilemma
KC Bansak
The Nonproliferation Review 18 (2), 349-368, 2011
52011
A Generalized Framework for the Estimation of Causal Moderation Effects with Randomized Treatments and Non-Randomized Moderators
K Bansak
arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02954, 2017
22017
Pruning the Nuclear Triad? The Pros and Cons of Submarines, Bombers, and Missiles
K Reif, T Sharp, K Bansak
The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation 16, 2013
22013
Delegates catch early glimpses of BWC Review
K Bansak
Arms Control Today 40 (8), 47, 2010
22010
Matching Refugees to Host Country Locations Based on Preferences and Outcomes
A Acharya, K Bansak, J Hainmueller
arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07355, 2019
12019
Issues Develop as BWC Review Approaches
K Bansak
Arms Control Today 41 (1), 44, 2011
12011
Why Austerity? The Mass Politics of a Contested Policy
K Bansak, MM Bechtel, Y Margalit
The Mass Politics of a Contested Policy (November 13, 2019), 2019
2019
Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments
L Jenke, K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Available at SSRN 3485375, 2019
2019
“Conjoint Survey Experiments” For Druckman, James N., and Donald P. Green, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Advances in Experimental Political Science, New York: Cambridge University …
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
2019
Can nonexperts really emulate statistical learning methods? A comment on “The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism”
K Bansak
Political Analysis 27 (3), 370-380, 2019
2019
Combining Outcome-Based and Preference-Based Matching: The g-Constrained Priority Mechanism
A Acharya, K Bansak, J Hainmueller
arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07355, 2019
2019
Comparative Causal Mediation and Relaxing the Assumption of No Mediator–Outcome Confounding: An Application to International Law and Audience Costs
K Bansak
Political Analysis, 1-22, 2018
2018
Europeans would accept more Refugees—if the asylum system were fair
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
LSE Department of Government Blog, 2017
2017
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20