Kirk Bansak
Kirk Bansak
Verified email at ucsd.edu
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Science 354 (6309), 217-222, 2016
3172016
Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment
K Bansak, J Ferwerda, J Hainmueller, A Dillon, D Hangartner, ...
Science 359 (6373), 325-329, 2018
1092018
The number of choice tasks and survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Political Analysis 26 (1), 112-119, 2018
512018
Europeans support a proportional allocation of asylum seekers
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, D Hangartner
Nature Human Behaviour 1 (7), 1-6, 2017
312017
Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Political Science Research and Methods, 1-19, 2019
282019
The ideological basis of the Grexit debate
K Bansak, M Bechtel, J Hainmueller, Y Margalit
72016
Enhancing compliance with an evolving treaty: a task for an improved BWC intersessional process
KC Bansak
Arms Control Today 41 (5), 13, 2011
72011
Conjoint Survey Experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto, JN Druckman, ...
Cambridge Handbook of Advances in Experimental Political Science …, 2019
62019
Biodefense and transparency: The dual-use dilemma
KC Bansak
The Nonproliferation Review 18 (2), 349-368, 2011
52011
Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2017. Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, J Daniel
Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper, 0
4
Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2017.“
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, J Daniel
The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments …, 0
4
Issues Develop as BWC Review Approaches
K Bansak
Arms Control Today 41 (1), 44, 2011
32011
Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Elections: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect (AMCE)
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, DJ Hopkins, T Yamamoto
Available at SSRN, 2020
22020
Why Austerity? The Mass Politics of a Contested Policy
K Bansak, MM Bechtel, Y Margalit
The Mass Politics of a Contested Policy (November 13, 2019), 2019
22019
Can nonexperts really emulate statistical learning methods? A comment on “The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism”
K Bansak
Political Analysis 27 (3), 370-380, 2019
22019
A Generalized Framework for the Estimation of Causal Moderation Effects with Randomized Treatments and Non-Randomized Moderators
K Bansak
arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02954, 2017
22017
Pruning the Nuclear Triad? The Pros and Cons of Submarines, Bombers, and Missiles
K Reif, T Sharp, K Bansak
The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation 16, 2013
22013
Delegates catch early glimpses of BWC Review
K Bansak
Arms Control Today 40 (8), 47, 2010
22010
Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto.. Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments
K Bansak, J Hainmueller, J Daniel
Political Analysis (), 0
2
Left-Right Ideology and the Debate over International Bailouts: The Case of Grexit
K Bansak, MM Bechtel, J Hainmueller, Y Margalit
The Journal of Politics 82 (2), 509-528, 2020
12020
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20