Understanding the Comparative Fit Index: It's all about the base! S Van Laar, J Braeken Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 26 (1), 2021 | 41 | 2021 |
Random responders in the TIMSS 2015 student questionnaire: A threat to validity? S Van Laar, J Braeken Journal of Educational Measurement 59 (4), 470-501, 2022 | 24 | 2022 |
Caught off base: A note on the interpretation of incremental fit indices S Van Laar, J Braeken Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 29 (6), 935-943, 2022 | 23 | 2022 |
The detection and modeling of direct effects in latent class analysis JHM Janssen, S Van Laar, MJ De Rooij, J Kuha, Z Bakk Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 26 (2), 280-290, 2019 | 22 | 2019 |
The impact of inconsistent responders to mixed-worded scales on inferences in international large-scale assessments I Steinmann, D Sánchez, S van Laar, J Braeken Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 29 (1), 5-26, 2022 | 16 | 2022 |
Prevalence of random responders as a function of scale position and questionnaire length in the TIMSS 2015 eighth-grade student questionnaire S Van Laar, J Braeken International Journal of Testing 24 (1), 24-52, 2024 | 1 | 2024 |
How Randomly are Students Random Responding to your Questionnaire? Within-Person Variability in Random Responding across Scales in the TIMSS 2015 eighth-grade Student Questionnaire S van Laar, J Chen, J Braeken Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 22 (1), 90-107, 2024 | | 2024 |
Who are those random responders on your survey? The case of the TIMSS 2015 student questionnaire J Chen, S van Laar, J Braeken Large-scale Assessments in Education 11 (1), 37, 2023 | | 2023 |
Null Baseline Modeling Approaches with Applications in International Large-Scale Educational Assessments S van Laar | | 2023 |