Do Justices Defend the Speech They Hate? An Analysis of In-Group Bias on the US Supreme Court L Epstein, CM Parker, JA Segal Journal of Law and Courts 6 (2), 237-262, 2018 | 44 | 2018 |
Do justices defend the speech they hate? In-group bias, opportunism, and the First Amendment L Epstein, C Parker, J Segal APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper, American Political Science Association 2013 …, 2013 | 26 | 2013 |
Ideological Voting in Supreme Court Federalism Cases, 1953–2007 CM Parker Justice System Journal 32 (2), 206-234, 2011 | 9 | 2011 |
The Chief Justice versus the iconoclast: Popular constitutionalism and support for using “sociological gobbledygook” in legal decisions BW Woodson, CM Parker Law & Society Review 55 (4), 657-679, 2021 | 4 | 2021 |
Normative Preferences and Responses to Dissension on the US Supreme Court CM Parker, BW Woodson Justice System Journal 41 (3), 220-243, 2020 | 4 | 2020 |
Federalism and Historical Voting on the US Supreme Court CM Parker Justice System Journal 39 (3), 228-252, 2018 | 3 | 2018 |
Strategic Cooperation: Modeling Concurring Behavior on the US Supreme Court AJ O’Geen, CM Parker American Politics Research 44 (4), 618-648, 2016 | 3 | 2016 |
The Conscientious Justice: How Supreme Court Justices' Personalities Influence the Law, the High Court, and the Constitution by Ryan Black, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, and … CM Parker Political Science Quarterly 136 (2), 374-376, 2021 | | 2021 |
Supreme Court justices cooperate strategically to strengthen coalitions AJ O'Geen, CM Parker USApp-American Politics and Policy Blog, 2015 | | 2015 |
Do Justices Defend the Speech they Hate L Epstein, C PARKER, J SEGAL Group, 2013 | | 2013 |
Patterns and Consequences of Supreme Court Decision Making on Federalism Cases CM Parker State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2011 | | 2011 |